Page 83 - #56 English
P. 83

ence – and it can be – but for a lot of roasters it’s a com-  The Real Dark Art of Blending
              mercial necessity rather than a luxury. It’s often the case
              that a roaster’s blend will include the waste or “buffer”   I can see why a lot of roasters and baristas don’t like
              inventory of the business. As the most popular product the   blends. Quite often they’re a disappointing representation
              blend can be a great way to sell coffee that are getting long   of the coffees within. You take a chocolaty Brazilian and
              in the tooth or under-performing on their own. Although   a juicy Kenyan, put them together and you get a powdery,
              it may not always hurt the quality of the Blend (it might be   dry, sour blend. But why? Shouldn’t you get fruity
              a great coffee that just isn’t selling well!) it does damage   chocolate?! No. Not unless you understand solubility and
              the integrity and original intent of the business to sell one.  how it plays a part in blending. If you have ever tasted
                  So that’s why roasters blend from a rather commercial   the components of a blend separately, and then together
              standpoint. But why do some roasters choose blending while   as a blend, you may have noticed that the blend tastes
              others stay entirely away?                       nothing like the best of its components. In fact, it tastes
                                                               like the worst of them. This is because the coffees have
              Pro Blending                                     differing solubilities. Please, allow me to explain.Back in
                                                               my post on Talking about Roasts I mentioned that a de-
                  Blending is often touted as a way to make a product   veloped roast makes a coffee more soluble. In other
              greater than the sum of its parts. From this standpoint,   words, it allows water to permeate its structure and dis-
              blending allows coffee  to hide their faults and show their   solve its flavour. Unfortunately, solubility isn’t a yes/no
              strengths. I believe this is often just wishful thinking. If you   situation. There are many shades of solubility, and every
              blend one thin, acidic coffee, and one rich and sweet coffee,   coffee is a little different.
              you don’t magically get a juicy rounded cup. You get a cof-  Think of an aeropress with 6g of a very soluble coffee
              fee that’s a bit acidic, a bit sweet and has a mouthfeel   (A) and 6g of another coffee that’s less soluble (B). From
              somewhere between thin and rich. Blending doesn’t just   the moment you add water, those two coffees will extract
              hide the negatives and bring out the positives, it puts ev-  at different rates. Let’s stop the brew at different points and
              erything together and dilutes those qualities according to   check in to see what those coffees will taste like.
              the ratio.                                       • 2:00  (A)will be powering towards a full extraction, begin-
                  Some go so far as to say that single origin/estate/  ning to produce some nice sweetness and roundness. (B)
              microlot coffee will never taste good on its own and must   will be struggling to keep up, and is still very under-extract-
              be blended to taste great (with the aggressive improvements   ed. To combat that sourness you let the brew go on.
              towards coffee quality in recent years this opinion is cer-  • 3:00  (A) is starting to taste a bit over extracted. B is only
              tainly less popular). I definitely don’t agree with this, but I   beginning to taste good, and needs more time.
              will happily admit that blends can – occasionally – taste
              significantly better than their components. This is rare, and
              involves a great deal of skill, but it’s far from impossible.

              Anti Blending

                  Others have gone as far as to stop blending alto-
              gether; notably Tim Wendelboe in Oslo and The
              Barn in Berlin. I believe the prevailing argument
              here is that the coffees being bought are incred-
              ibly complex, unique and special, so blending
              them would only serve to diminish their
              qualities. I think this is a noble and just cause
              – their coffees are indeed special – but I’m not
              convinced that this is the best course of action
              for the industry at large.I don’t believe the major-
              ity of coffee-drinking customers are quite ready to
              appreciate and understand why roasters have sud-
              denly dropped blends from their offering. Blends still
              hold a special place in customer’s hearts; they’re the
              flag-bearer for the business; the gateway to the rest of your
              offering. Don’t get me wrong: I’m definitely a strong advo-
              cate for exposing customers to unique and special coffees.
              I’m just wary of how we go about that as an industry.



                                                            83
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88